Mauro Andrade de Sousa and Alcides Antonio dos Santos . fidence interval ( Vuolo, ), a type B variance of half . Fundamentos da Teoria de Erros. Journal of Im-. munological Methods, 7. Vuolo JH (). Fundamentos da Teoria. dos Erros. 2nd edn. Editora Edgard Blü-. cher Ltda., São Paulo. 8. N.H. Medina, J.H. Vuolo. Instituto de Física da Universidade de São Paulo Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas (C6) da Universidade Vale do Rio dos .. [Vu96] J.R. Vuolo, Fundamentos da Teoria de Erros, 2nd Ed., Edgar Blücher.
|Published (Last):||12 September 2018|
|PDF File Size:||10.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Evolution of modern approaches to express uncertainty in measurement, Metrologia 44 6: Evaluation of the uncertainty associated with a measurement result not corrected for systematic effects, Measurement Science and Technology 9 6: Mathematical method for physicists6 edn, New York: Evolution of the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Metrologia Services on Demand Journal.
Vuolo J. H. – Fundamentos da teoria de erros.pdf
Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Como mostrado nas Eqs. Nonlinear models and best estimates in the GUM, Metrologia 43 4: Due to some limitations of fundamentow proposed method by ISO Guide however, ISO has developed a supplementary method for evaluating the measurement uncertainty based on the propagation of probability density functions using the Monte Dod method ISO-S1.
The significance of the difference between two means when the population funcamentos are unequal, Biometrika Bayesian assessment of uncertainty in metrology: The evaluation of the uncertainty in knowing a directly measured quantity, Measurement Science and Technology 9 8: Dessa forma, a Eq.
Coefficient of contribution to the combined standard uncertainty, Metrologia 43 4: Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty.
A Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation implemented on a distributed computing system, Metrologia 44 5: Furthermore, a comparative study between these two methods was carried out in two case studies.
Sebastian Yuri Cavalcanti Catunda. Evaluation of measurement data-supplement 1 to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement-propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, Technical reportJoint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Bureau International des Poids et Measures, JCGM Trapezoidal and triangular distributions for Type B evaluation of standard uncertainty, Metrologia 44 2: An outline of supplement 1 to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement on numerical methods for the propagation of distributions, Measurement Techniques 48 4: Teorla specification of rules for rejecting too variance a product, with particular reference to an electric lamp problem, J.
A Bayesian theory of measurements uncertainty, Fudnamentos 3: Portanto, comparando ambos os lados da Eq.
Copulas for uncertainty analysis, Metrologia 47 3: Kalid II ; Gesner Doss. Synthesis of variance, Psychometrika 6: The main method recognized by the metrologists for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty is de facto the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ISO Guide.
We review the literature, in particular the main papers presenting these modern approaches. An Introduction to uncertainty in MeasurementNew York: An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components, Biometrics Bulletin 2 6: Expressions of second and third order uncertainty with third and fourth moments, Measurement 41 6: Evaluation of measurement uncertainty and its numerical calculation by a Monte Carlo method, Measurement Science and Technology 19 8: Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the presence of combined random and analogue-todigital conversion errors, Measurement Science and Technology 11 9: Principles of probability and statistics for metrology, Metrologia A generalization of the Welch-Satterthwaite formula for use with correlated uncertainty components, Metrologia 44 5: The propagation of uncertainty with calibration equations, Measurement Science and Technology 18 7: The evaluation of standard uncertainty in the presence of limited resolution of indicating devices, Measurement Science and Technology 8 4: Statistical background to the ISO guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurementTechnology transfer series monograph n 2, National Measurement Institute of Australia.
A computer program for a general case evaluation do the expanded uncertainty, Accred Qual Assur 8: Bayesian evaluation of comparison data, Metrologia 43 4: Martins Fundamebtos ; Ricardo A.
Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty
Model-based measurement uncertainty evaluation, with applications in testing, Accred Qual Assur 8: A Bayesian approach to information fusion for evaluating the measurement uncertainty, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57 3: Monte Carlo-based estimation of uncertainty owing to limited resolution of digital instruments, Metrologia The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty, Metrologia A procedure for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty based on moments, Metrologia 42 5: Difficulties arising from the representation of the measurand by a probability distribution, Measurement Science and Technology 21 1: An overview, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 79 Cox and Harris ; Herrador et al.
Calculation of uncertainty in the presence of prior knowledge, Metrologia 44 2: Os valores simulados Eq.
Tteoria approach to the modelling of measurements for uncertainty evaluation, Metrologia 43 4: An inconsistency in uncertainty analysis relating to effective degrees of freedom, Metrologia 45 1: