The Body-cathexis Scale is examined to assess its psychometric properties. Results indicate a strong unidimensional measure with high internal consistency. The Body Cathexis Scale (BCS) was the first psychometric instrument devised to measure body dissatisfaction. In this study we report the. The oriainal Bodv-cathexis Scale (BCS) used by Secord and Jourard () consisted of a list of 46 parts or aspects of the body. These were rated by.
|Published (Last):||5 June 2010|
|PDF File Size:||8.1 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Feelings about the body have marked behavioral consequences, and as both casual and clinical observations suggest, body cathexis and body perceptions play scalle significant role in garment fit satisfaction.
This page was last edited cathezis 14 Mayat Similarly, social stimuli may play a reciprocal role in anticipating behavior, contributing to the formation of negative feelings about the body. Journal of Consulting Psychology. The means and standard deviations of each item were calculated to observe their ability to discriminate between Ss.
A psychometric investigation into the body-cathexis scale. These were rated by respondents according to a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strong positive to strong negative cathexis. The scale was completed in all cases within 20 min.
Seven items bory not have salient loadings of any of the factors. Among the few empirical studies relevant to the relatedness of the body and the self is that of Schilder, who — through a series of self-report questionnaires — procured evidence suggesting that negative feelings, associations, and memories about the body can probe higher levels of dissatisfaction with the catbexis.
Nevertheless, the seven-factor solution, upon rotation, showed clear simple structure and ease of interpretation. Retrieved from ” https: Factors caghexis an appropriate degree of determinancy were rotated to scalle structure using the Oblimin procedure of Jennrich and Sampson Gardner Press, New York. Internal structure, factor satisfaction, and reliability of the body cathexis scale.
Low body cathexis and preoccupation can contribute to the development of eating disorders among female adolescents in particular, often a result of societal pressures and expectations to achieve the ideal, thin body type. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17 5 Using scales of body cathexis and self cathexis, the Maslow Test of Psychological Security-Insecurity, and an anxiety-related body cathexis homonym test, Secord and Jourard concluded that the body and self tend to be cathected to the same degree.
Factor V is a body-built factor associated with weight, while Factor VI is a body-built factor associated with physique and muscular strength.
Tucker also discovered a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0. Skip to main content. However, this analysis does suggest that a number of aspects of the cathxis coalesce to form the strong unitary trait of body-cathexis.
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50 2 The items all lie within a positive manifold, the maximum inter-item correlation being 0. It is argued, on the basis of this investigation, that the BCS has cathdxis psychometric properties.
Body cathexis – Wikipedia
Tucker-was reluctant to use both sexes in his analysis-due to-evidence that sex influences feeling towards the body. It is recommended as a scale for research into the role of body feelings in self-concept and personality.
The BCS has been used in a variety of studies showing relationships to parental attitudes Remy,body size Jourard and Secord,somatic symptoms Johnson, and self-esteem Weinburg, The loadings for each item on the rotated factors is shown in Table 2.
British Journal of Psychology.
The Italian version of the Body Cathexis Scale.
Consumer behaviour Psychoanalytic terminology. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
The factor correlations reveal that they are not mutually independent as the smallest inter-factor correlation is scalee. Effects of advanced weight-training on body cathexis and self-esteem. As the findings of their study confirm, Muth and Cash suggest that the gender-differential societal and personal standards of body attractiveness place women at a higher predisposition for less favorable, more invested, and more distressing body image attitudes.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.