Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing. Author(s): P. Godefroid, M. Levin, D. Molnar. Download: Paper (PDF). Date: 8 Feb Document Type: Reports. Additional . Fuzzing or fuzz testing is an automated software testing technique that involves providing . A whitebox fuzzer can be very effective at exposing bugs that hide deep in the program. However, the time used for analysis (of the program or its. Automated Whitebox. Fuzz Testing. Patrice Godefroid (Microsoft Research) . Michael Y. Levin (Microsoft Center for. Software Excellence) . David Molnar.

Author: Tygoshicage Kazibar
Country: Puerto Rico
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 9 April 2018
Pages: 483
PDF File Size: 4.28 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.33 Mb
ISBN: 314-5-24959-244-4
Downloads: 8759
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vulrajas

If the program’s specification is available, a whitebox fuzzer might leverage techniques tessting model-based testing to generate inputs and check the program outputs against the program specification.

For instance, a program written in C may or may not crash when an input causes a buffer overflow. A generation-based fuzzer generates inputs from scratch.

Hence, a blackbox fuzzer can execute several hundred inputs per second, can be easily parallelized, and can scale to programs of arbitrary size. Software testing Computer security procedures.

When the program processes the received file and the recorded checksum does not match the re-computed checksum, then the file is rejected as invalid. Typically, fuzzers are used to generate inputs whitebod programs that take structured inputs, such as a filea sequence of keyboard or mouse eventsor a sequence of messages.

Levin, David Molnar November If the two variants produce different output for the same input, then one may be buggy and should be examined more closely. For instance the CERT Coordination Center provides the Linux triage tools which group tewting inputs by the produced stack trace and lists each group according to their probability to be exploitable.

  BS EN ISO 12100-2 PDF

Fuzzing is used mostly as an automated technique to expose vulnerabilities in security-critical programs that might be exploited with malicious intent.

If the whitebox fuzzer takes relatively too long to generate an input, a blackbox fuzzer will be more efficient. However, the time used for analysis of the program or its specification can become prohibitive. Testing programs with random inputs dates back to the s when data was still stored on punched cards.

For instance, if the fkzz can be modelled as an abstract syntax treethen a smart mutation-based fuzzer [26] would employ random transformations to move complete subtrees from one node fizz another. What constitutes a valid input may be explicitly specified in an input model.

Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing

Static program analysis allows to analyze a program without actually executing it. In the case of testing, the fjzz would write the particular sequence of inputs that will trigger a crash. A CRC is an error-detecting code that ensures that the integrity of the data contained in the input file is preserved during transmission. Some fuzzers have the capability to do both, to generate inputs from scratch and to generate inputs by mutation of existing seeds. In DecemberGoogle announced OSS-Fuzz which allows for continuous fuzzing of several security-critical open-source projects.

Patrice GodefroidMichael Y. A white-box fuzzer [30] [25] leverages program analysis to systematically increase code coverage or to reach certain critical program locations. The corpus of seed files may contain thousands of potentially similar inputs.

Fuzzing – Wikipedia

This structure is specified, e. For instance, a division operator might cause a division by zero error, or a system call may crash the program. Retrieved 10 July The rationale is, if a fuzzer does not exercise certain structural elements in the program, then it is also not able to reveal bugs that are hiding in these elements.


We then present detailed experiments with several Windows applications. We describe key optimizations needed to make dynamic test generation scale to large input files and long execution traces with hundreds of millions of instructions.

For instance, AFL is a dumb mutation-based fuzzer that modifies a seed file by flipping random bitsby substituting random bytes with “interesting” values, and by moving or deleting blocks of data. Even items not normally considered as input can be fuzzed, such as the contents of databasesshared memoryenvironment variables or the precise interleaving of threads.

Retrieved 12 March Retrieved from ” https: The project was designed to test the reliability of Unix programs by executing a large number of random inputs in quick succession until they crashed.

However, there are attempts to identify and re-compute a potential checksum in the mutated input, once a dumb mutation-based fuzzer has modified the protected data. For other uses, see Fuzz disambiguation. A whitebox fuzzer can be very effective at exposing bugs that hide deep in the program. Fuzz testing is an effective technique for finding security vulnerabilities in software. For instance, AFL and libFuzzer utilize lightweight instrumentation to trace basic block transitions exercised by an input.

This leads to a reasonable performance overhead but informs the fuzzer about the increase in code coverage during fuzzing, which makes gray-box fuzzers extremely efficient vulnerability detection tools.