Weight: g/Im. Product End Use: Upholstery. Identification. Tested For: Bente Ellingsoe, Quality Department. Key Test: ASTM D/ACT K. Gabriel A/S. ASTM DAbrasion Test by Oscillatory – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. ASTM D* Wyzenbeek (Oscillatory Cylinder). The ASTM D is a test of the American Society of Testing and Materials. A Wyzenbeek machine is.
|Published (Last):||21 August 2004|
|PDF File Size:||10.67 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For example, a predetermined number of abrasion cycles at specified test conditions may be performed on a series of specimens, which are then subjected to a strength or barrier performance test.
The number of cycles that the fabric can endure before fabric shows objectionable change in appearance yarn breaks, pilling, holes is counted. With permanent abradants that use hardened metal or equivalent surfaces, it is assumed that the abradant will not change appreciably in a specific series of tests, but obviously similar abradants used in different laboratories will not dd4157 change at the same rate due to differences in usage.
Specific instances have been described. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the specification. Other procedures for measuring the abrasion resistance of textile fabrics are given in: With disposable abradants, the abradant is used only once or changed after limited use. It is not surprising, therefore, to find that there are many different types of abrasion testing machines, abradants, testing conditions, testing procedures, methods of evaluation of abrasion resistance, and interpretation of results.
Association of Contact Textiles Website. Wyzenbeek — New Ashm Video.
Understanding Abrasion Testing
This test method may not be usable for some fabric constructions. Option 4—Breaking Strength Loss. Other asgm for measuring the abrasion c4157 of textile fabrics are given in: Fabric samples are mounted flat and rubbed in a figure eight like motion using a piece of worsted wool cloth as the abradant. Four options for evaluation are included:. Studies have shown that Wyzenbeek test results on the same fabric can and do vary significantly from test to test. The test results from the two laboratories should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, at a probability level chosen prior to the d457 series.
In fact, Wyzenbeek results abovedouble rubs have not been shown to be an indicator of increased fabric lifespan. ACT reminds you that there are many points to consider when specifying textiles.
The results obtained from the use of this instrument assist in evaluating these factors relative to the wear serviceability of the final textile product in specific end uses. The relationship varies with different end uses, and c4157 factors may be necessary in any calculation of predicted durability from specific abrasion data. This test method provides a comparative measurement of the resistance of woven textile fabrics to abrasion, and d415 not necessarily predict the actual performance of fabrics in actual use.
The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other.
Understanding Abrasion Testing – Alendel Fabrics Ltd.
Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. Wire screen or wire mesh is used as an abradant when the test specimen is more abrasive than the cotton duck. Because there is a definite need for measuring the relative resistance to abrasion, this is one of the several standardized guides and methods that is useful to help minimize the inherent variation in results that may occur. The abradant must accordingly be changed at frequent intervals or checked periodically against a standard.
In an effort to bring further clarity to the appropriate consideration of double rub numbers, as of April 1,textile companies and furniture manufacturers that use the ACT certification mark for abrasion on their samples will now include the following statement whenever publishing test results in excess ofdouble rubs: Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard.
Experience has shown in many instances, that relative results obtained with this instrument when used on a series of fabrics, agreed with those obtained based upon performance in end use. Accordingly, specifiers should consider the following qualifiers when assessing double rub ratings: Laboratory tests may be reliable as an indication of relative end-use performance in cases where the difference in abrasion resistance of various materials is large, but they should not be relied upon where differences in laboratory test findings are small.
For survey details and additional research, read our White Papers. As a minimum, the test samples should be used that are as homogenous as possible, that are drawn from the material from which the disparate test results were obtained, and that are randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing.
Wyzenbeek testing measures flat abrasion resistance and does not consider edge abrasion or other types of surface wear that may occur in actual upholstered applications. The test results from the two laboratories should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, at a probability level chosen prior to the testing series.
ASTM D – 08() Standard Guide for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Uniform Abrasion)
The measurement of the relative amount of abrasion may also be affected by the method of evaluation and may be influenced by the judgment of the operator.
However, caution is advised because anomalous results may occur due to uncontrolled factors in manufacturing or other processes. Number of cycles determines abrasion rating. Make sure to check a d44157 post from the Association of Contract Textiles regarding acceptable abrasion standards. For more information please refer to abrasion white papers on the ACT website. This explains the requirements for both residential and contract spaces.
If bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future test results must be adjusted in consideration of the known bias. The resistance to abrasion is affected by many factors that include the inherent mechanical properties of the fibers; the dimensions of the fibers; the structure of the yarns; the construction of the fabrics; x4157 type, kind, amount of treatment added to the fibers, yarns or fabric; the nature of the abradant; the tension on the specimen; the pressure between the specimen and the abradant; and the dimensional changes in the specimen.
Therefore, ACT does not recommend using absolute numbers c4157 comparision. Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.
My go to reference on the subject is the Association for Contract Textiles. Four options for evaluation are included: Martindale Test Video —. Fabrics of all types including carpets, garments asmt nonwovens may be tested under this method. Within the text, the inch-pound units are shown in parentheses. As a minimum, test samples that are as homogeneous as possible, drawn from the material from which the disparate test results were obtained, and satm assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing.
A Wyzenbeek machine is used for this test allowing samples of the test fabric to be pulled tight in a frame and held stationary.
It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Other fabrics with established test values may be used for this purpose.