Inalienable Possessionstests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, Annette B. Weiner . Afterword: The Challenge of Inalienable Possessions. : Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving ( ): Annette B. Weiner: Books. In Inalienable possessions, Annette Weiner () focuses on the paradox of ‘ keeping-while-giving’ rather than the ‘norm of reciprocity’ as the.
|Published (Last):||19 June 2017|
|PDF File Size:||19.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.43 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The development of Polynesian kingdoms is an example. The Forgotten Dimension Chapter: There, only chiefs were allowed to engage annete Kula exchange. The Forgotten Dimension Inalienable Possessions: Power is intimately involved in cultural reproduction, and Weiner describes the location of power in each society, showing how the degree of control over inaliebable production and distribution of cloth wealth coincides with women’s rank and the development of hierarchy in the community.
Moreover, they acknowledge differences of identity of individuals or groups linked by various kinds of exchanges.
She currently serves as President of the American Anthropological Association. These things, such as valuables, talismansknowledge, and rites, confirm identities and their continuity over time.
He states that these objects are “durable wealth [that] is collective property that is continually in circulation among persons who have temporary possession of it. She currently serves as President of the American Anthropological Association.
Inalienable Possessions by Annette B. Weiner – Paperback – University of California Press
This page was last edited on 1 Augustat David Ricardo Murray N. Classical, Early, and Medieval Plays and Playwrights: About the Book Inalienable Possessions tests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, economics, power, and gender in an exciting challenge to accepted theories of reciprocity and marriage exchange.
However, these possessions may also become destabilizing, as elites reconstruct those sacred histories to identify themselves with the past; for example, Gandhi invoked the traditional hand spinning traditional cloth, khadi, to contest British rule, which Nehru referred to as Gandhi’s “livery of freedom”. A critical part of Znnette argument is that the ability to keep inalienable possessions outside of exchange is a source of difference, and hence brings high status.
Reciprocity, she says, is only the superficial aspect of exchange, which overlays much more politically powerful strategies of “keeping-while-giving.
Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension
Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Possfssions Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations. Original affluent society Formalist vs substantivist debate The Great Transformation Peasant economics Culture of poverty Political economy State formation Nutritional anthropology Heritage commodification Anthropology of poossessions.
The Kula trade was organized differently in the more hierarchical parts of the Trobriand islands. Thus, when they are transferred from one individual or group to another the objects reserve meaningful bonds associated with that of the giver and their lineage.
The subtitle of Weiner’s book is “The paradox of keeping-while-giving”; they are given as gifts not sold yet still retain a tie to their owners. Inalienable Possessions tests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, economics, power, and gender in an exciting challenge to accepted theories of reciprocity and marriage exchange.
Inalienable possessions are nonetheless frequently drawn into exchange networks.
Related articles Original affluent society Formalist vs substantivist debate The Great Transformation Peasant economics Culture of poverty Political economy State formation Nutritional anthropology Heritage commodification Anthropology of development.
She died in The paradox of keeping-while-giving is a concept certain to influence future developments in ethnography and the theoretical study of gender and exchange. Maintaining society thus requires not keeping-while-givingbut ” keeping-for-giving and giving-for-keeping. Weiner points out that the posseessions gender relations of “sibling intimacy” affect the exchange of these inalienable objects.
She also describes practices of loaning inalienable possessions as a way of either “temporarily making kin of non-kin” or garnering status.
Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension – California Scholarship
Women or the feminine element also exercise power by providing legitimation and redistributing of political and religious power among groups in a society. TrobriandsMalinowskinorm of reciprocityprimitive social relations.
Other inalienable possessions, whether material objects, landed property, ancestral myths, or sacred knowledge, bestow social identity and rank as well. Economists have often shunned the idea of pondering exactly why people want goods. These goods are frequently produced by women, like the feather cloak above.
The possibilities of transmission in the face of the canon for guardianship establish for ritual leaders a domain of authority that in certain situations leads to a possesaions position of rank. Landed estates in the Middle Agesfor example, had to remain intact and even if sold, they could be reclaimed by blood kin. The hau can bring strength or even knowledge potentially but a person may also have the risk of losing their hau.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.