NOTE: The original AA1 POH is not legal to use due to later revisions. The Gulfstream American version is the latest and the LEGAL one to use. Original. MODEL AA5B TIGER. TABLE OF CONTENTS airplane was delivered, it was equipped with a Pilot’s Operating Handbook, engine operator’s manual, weight. AA1 POH · AA1A POH · AA1B POH · AA1B WITH DMA AUX FUEL POH · AA1C POH · AA5 POH · AA5A Cheetah POH · AA5B Tiger ( – ) POH.
|Country:||Moldova, Republic of|
|Published (Last):||1 January 2011|
|PDF File Size:||9.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
AA5 Traveler Cruise Performance.
POH | Grumman Pilots Association
Data are given for the airplane at maximum gross weight. Landing Distance Short field: Marietta, GA Display Name: Log in or Sign up.
One parameter that is not usually pho is best range. No, create an account now. Shorter takeoff and landing distances, faster airspeeds, etc. Jan 1, Messages: Dowagiac, MI Display Name: Feb 23, Messages: Anyone know where a POH is online so i can review procedures and speeds? Those parameters are given at the standard temperature for each pressure altitude; i. For the Traveler, the POH takeoff and landing charts are so sparse that they are not graphed here.
The information was always there, just cloaked a little bit.
Byington’s article states that the calibrated airspeed  for maximum specific range is independent of altitude. Guys, I am trying to get checked out in a ’75 AA5B this weekend. I have two versions of the AA5B handbook.
These charts were compiled from data for the series only. Mar 5, Messages: The later one is labeled for years and speeds are in both MPH and kts. There is no difference in airplane performance.
Posted fuel burn for the Cheetah is different at ‘ DA than for higher altitudes. It wouldn’t be much of a graph. Yes, my password is: Do you already have an account? Sep 19, Messages: Your name or email address: Northern New Mexico Display Name: The charts here are based on density altitude which is easy to calculate these days. Dave TheisenJun 23, At Grumman speeds, this is the same as calibrated airspeed. Data for the ‘s and ‘s should not be substantially different.
ChemGuyJun 23, It’s a simple task to divide one number by the other, so the charts include graphs for specific range miles per gallon. Melville Byington and Russ Erb wrote articles on this topic over twenty years ago, and David Rogers more recently, but their results still don’t seem to sa5b widely used.
Sep 26, Messages: Can’t imagine why the POH numbers would differ from ’75 to ‘ I agree with Pilawt. So the manuals have performance listed in tables that help the pilot avoid having to calculate density altitude.
The manufacturer’s tables give figures for airspeed miles per hour and fuel burn gallons per hour. Once this number is known, the pilot can easily get the required indicated airspeed, and fly that speed at any altitude to maximize his range. I have contacted a few “experts” about the discrepancy, but nobody has come up with an explanation for it. For lighter weights, performance is better in all parameters. You must log in or sign up to reply oph.
Grumman Pilot Operating Handbooks
Otherwise I don’t know of any reason for performance numbers of Tigers built during the ’70s being different from one another. Rogers makes the same point in his excellent series on technical flying. I found a 77 online but I also saw some info that speeds and such may be different between a 75 and You’d better get the right numbers, your instructor is a hard ass.
They are graphic, so that intermediate values are available without the need to use that now cheap electronic calculator for interpolation. They are derived directly from POH data. Jun 27, Messages: One which was sold as representing 75 and 76 models although it is not dated is in MPH.